This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Clapp, J. F. Articles by Crass, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Clapp, J. F., III Articles by Rizk, K. H. Articles by Appleby-Wineberg, S. K. Articles by Crass, J. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Second-Trimester Placental Volumes Predict Birth Weight at Term

Departments of Reproductive Biology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Radiology, Case Western University and MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH 44109

Karen H. Rizk, MS

Sarah K. Appleby-Wineberg, BS

Jeffrey R. Crass, MD

Departments of Reproductive Biology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Radiology, Case Western University and MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio

Objective: To test the hypothesis that second-trimester placental growth is a major determinant of size at birth in healthy, active women.

Methods: Three serial measurements of fetal morphometry and placental volume were obtained between the 14th and 26th weeks of an accurately dated singleton pregnancy in 40 subjects.

Results: Second-trimester placental volumes were variable, increasing from (mean ± standard deviation) 130 ± 35 to 248 ± 67 and 375 ± 92 cm³ at 16, 20, and 24 weeks, with an average growth rate of 31 ± 8 cm³/weeks. At delivery, fresh placental volumes and birth weights were also variable, ranging between 304-823 cm³ and 2.6-4.4 kg, respectively. Significant correlations (r > 0.79) were present between second-trimester placental volume or growth rate and placental volume at delivery and birth weight, corrected for gestational age and infant sex. However, correlations between second-trimester fetal biometry and both corrected birth weight and birth weight percentile were poor (r < 0.45).

Conclusion: Second-trimester placental volumes and growth rates are good predictors of size at birth in healthy, active women. We speculate that this technique may have real value as an early screening tool to identify cases at risk of anomalous third-trimester growth.

Key Words: Pregnancy • birth weight • placenta • growth

Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, Vol. 2, No. 1, 19-22 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/107155769500200104


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?