Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rsci

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moses, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Griffiths, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moses, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Griffiths, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Can a Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Be an Advantage to the Outcome of Pregnancy?

R. G. Moses, FRACP

Diabetes Education Centre, Wollongong, Australia; 4/393 Crown Street, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia

R. D. Griffiths, MSc,Hons

Diabetes Education Centre, Wollongong, Australia

Objectives: We examined the obstetric outcomes of 138 treated women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) compared with 144 women who had a 2-hour, 75-g glucose tolerance test result of between 7.0 and 7.9 mmol/L (126 and 142 mg/dL, respectively).

Methods: The subjects for this study were consecutive patients from a universal testing program for GDM during 1993. Gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed if the 2-hour plasma glucose level was 8.0 mmol/L (144 mg/dL) or greater after a 75-g glucose load in the fasting state.

Results: Treated women with GDM had a macrosomia rate of 8.0%, which was significantly less (P < .02) than the rate of 17.4% in the "normal" women. Treated women with GDM had a 2.2% rate of fetuses weighing less than 2500 g, which was significantly lower (P = .05) than the 6.9% rte for normal women. Overall, insulin therapy was used in 23.2% of the women with GDM, and no insulin-treated woman had either a macrosomic fetus or a fetus weighing less than 2500 g.

Conclusions: Treated women with GDM, particularly those who receive insulin, have a more favorable fetal outcome than women who have a glucose result between 7.0 and 7.9 mmol/L (126 and 142 mg/dL). These results suggest that the current diagnostic criteria for GDM, with respect to fetal outcomes, may need revision, and an additional subgroup of pregnant women may benefit from dietary advice.

Key Words: Gestational diabetes • diabetes • pregnancy

Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, Vol. 2, No. 3, 523-525 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/107155769500200303


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?