Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernandes, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by McCoshen, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fernandes, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Koodoo, S. R
Right arrow Articles by Wodzicki, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Allardice, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by McCoshen, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Maternal Prolactin Secretion Is Phasic During Induced Term and Post-Term Labor

P. Audrey Fernandes, PhD

Stanley R Koodoo, BSc (Med)

Agnes M. Wodzicki, ART

James G. Allardice, MD

John A. McCoshen, PhD

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Manitoba, Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Objective: We hypothesized that regimens of labor induction do not alter the biphasic secretion of maternal prolactin (PRL) seen during spontaneous labor.

Methods: Serial blood samples drawn from 12 women before, during, and after induced labor were assayed for PRL and hCG and compared with cervical dilatation and uterine contraction frequency (UCF). Induction methods were cervical ripening with dinoprostone gel (Prepidil) followed by oxytocin infusion (in = 1), anniotomy followed by oxytocin (n = 4), oxytocin followed by anniotomy (n = 3), anniotomy only (n = 2), and oxytocin only (n = 2).

Results: Regardless of the induction method, PRL decreased with advancing cervical dilatation during the first stage of labor and reached a nadir at full dilatation. Prolactin levels then increased rapidly during the second stage, correlating significantly with the increase in UCF, and peaked at 1 hour postpartum before decreasing. Levels of hCG increased during labor and peaked just before or at delivery before rapidly decreasing.

Conclusions: The biphasic secretion of maternal PRL is a fundamental characteristic of active term labor and occurs regardless of the method used to induce labor.

Key Words: Prolactin • induced labor • cervical dilatation

Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, Vol. 4, No. 2, 81-85 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/107155769700400206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?