Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahokas, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sibai, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ahokas, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sibai, B. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effect of Indomethacin and N{omega}-Nitro-L-Arginine Methyl Ester on the Pressure/Flow Relation in Isolated Perfused Hindlimbs From Pregnant and Nonpregnant Rats

Robert A. Ahokas, PhD

Division of Maternal/Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee; Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Physiology/Biophysics, University of Tennessee Memphis, 800 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163

Steven A. Friedman, MD

Baha M. Sibai, MD

Division of Maternal/Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee

Objective: To compare the pressure/flow relationship and to assess the roles of prostaglandins and nitric oxide in flow-induced vasodilation in the nonpregnant and late-pregnant rat hindlimb vasculture.

Methods: Pressure/flow and conductance/flow relationships were determined in isolated, Krebs buffer-perfused, norepinephrine (0.5 µmol/L) preconstricted hindlimbs from nonpregnant and late-pregnant Wistar-Kyoto rats before and after inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase with indomethacin (20 µmol/L), or nitric oxide synthase with N{omega}-nitr-L-arginine methyl ester (300 µmol/L).

Results: There were no significant differences in baseline perfusion pressure between nonpregnant and pregnant rat hindlimbs perfused at 2 mL/min (20.6 ± 0.8 and 19.7 ± 1.1 mmHg, respectively) and nonepinephrine increased perfusion pressure about twofold (40.8 ± 2.0 and 34.8 ± 1.8 mmHg, respectively). After constriction, perfusion pressure increased linearly as flow was increased in a stepwise manner to a maximum of 4 mL/min. The slope of the pressure/flow regression line for the pregnant rat hindlimbs (6.00) was significantly lower (P ≤ 001) than that for the nonpregnant rat hindlimbs (8.44). Vascular conductance also increased as flow was increased, and was significantly greater at all flow rates in the pregnant compared to the nonpregnant rat hindlimbs. Indomethacin slightly decreased the constrictor response to norepinephrine and increased the pressure/flow regression line slope in nonpregnant, but not in pregnant rat hindlimbs. N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester abolished flow-mediated vasodilation in nonpregnant and pregnant rat hindlimbs, and there was no longer any significant difference between the pressure/flow regression line slopes.

Conclusion: These results suggest that flow-induced vasodilation, mediated by endothelium-derived nitric oxide, is enhanced during pregnancy allowing the maternal vasculature to accommodate increased blood flow without increased blood pressure.

Key Words: Pregnancy • vascular conductance • nitric oxide • prostaglandin • perfused hindlimb

Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, Vol. 4, No. 5, 229-235 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/107155769700400502


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?