Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register

SAGETRACK
Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silver, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Neerhof, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silver, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Haney, E. I.
Right arrow Articles by Grobman, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by MacGregor, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Casele, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Neerhof, M. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Comparison of Active Phase Labor Between Triplet, Twin, and Singleton Gestations

Richard K. Silver, MD

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Evanston & Prentice Womens' Hospitals, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois; r-silver{at}nwu.edu

Elaine I. Haney, BS, MT

William A. Grobman, MD

Scott N. MacGregor, DO

Holly L. Casele, MD

Mark G. Neerhof, DO

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Evanston & Prentice Womens' Hospitals, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois

Objective: To characterize the active phase of labor in triplet pregnancies and compare it with gestational age-matched twins and singletons.

Methods: Active phase rates were calculated beginning at 5 cm of dilation for women with triplet gestations longer than 24 weeks who labored and reached the second stage. Twin and singleton cohorts that also completed the first stage of labor were matched for gestational age at deliverty (± 1 week), parity, and epidural use. Intrapartum variables included oxytocin use (induction or augmentation, duration of infusion, and maximum dosage), cervical dilation at membrane rupture, and active phase dilation rate.

Results: Thirty-two triplet pregnancies met inclusion criteria between January 1994 and September 1998 and were each compared with twin and singleton cases in a 1:2 ratio. Triplet and twin active phase rates, while similar (1.8 versus 1.7 cm/hour, respectively), were significantly lower than the mean singleton dilation rate (2.3 cm/hour, P = .02). No other intrapartum variables differed between the three groups. Despite controlling for gestational age of delivery, mean birth weights were significantly higher in singletons and correspondingly lower in twins and triplets (2493 versus 2112 and 1968 g, respectively; P = .001). An analysis of active phase dilation rates as a function of the cumulative birth weight per pregnancy demonstrated an inverse correlation, with slower progress in active labor associated with increasing total fetal weight (R = - .24; P = .002).

Conclusions: Triplet and twin active phase dilation proceeds at a slower rate than that observed in singleton pregnancies. The rate of active phase dilation is inversely correlated to total fetal weight.

Key Words: Triplets • twins • active phase of labor • multiple gestations

Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, Vol. 7, No. 5, 297-300 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/107155760000700505
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?