Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waugh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Halligan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waugh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bosio, P.
Right arrow Articles by Shennan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Halligan, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Inpatient Monitoring on an Outpatient Basis: Managing Hypertensive Pregnancies in the Community Using Automated Technologies

Jason Waugh, MBBS

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Leicester, Leicester, Maternal and Fetal ResearchUnit, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's, Kings and St Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College, London, United Kingdom; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Building, Leicester Royal Infrmary, Leicester LE2 2LX, United Kingdom jjsw{at}lineone.net

Paul Bosio, MD

Andrew Shennan, MD

Aidan Halligan, MD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Leicester, Leicester, Maternal and Fetal ResearchUnit, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's, Kings and St Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College, London, United Kingdom

Automated measurement of blood pressure and urinalysis is reviewed, and the strengths and weaknesses of these devices are compared with conventional techniques. The few early reports of such management strategies are reviewed with emphasis on the advantages of automated monitoring. The article concludes with a review of published pilot data in this field and places those findings in the context of recent recommendations for the development of obstetric care in the United Kingdom.

Key Words: Pregnancy • preeclampsia • urinalysis • blood pressure measurement

Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, Vol. 8, No. 1, 14-17 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/107155760100800102
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?